Optometry360 Logo White
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board

What are you looking for?

  • Anterior Segment
  • Cataract
  • Cornea and External Disease
  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Dry Eye
  • Early Onset Cataracts
  • Exclusives
  • General
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Glaucoma
  • Industry News
  • Inherited Retinal Disease
  • IOLs
  • Neurotrophic Keratitis
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Oculoplastics
  • Optometry
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice Management
  • Presbyopia
  • Refractive Surgery/Vision Correction
  • Residents & Young Ophthalmologists
  • Retina
  • Retina Care 360
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
  • Spotlight Series
  • The Interventional Glaucoma Project
  • The Ophthalmic Project
  • Trending Topics
Spotlight - The Future of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane in Oculoplastic Surgery
Optometry360 Logo White
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board
Home > Conference Roundup > Using TECNIS Odyssey™️ IOL in practice: patient selection and outcomes
  • Conference Roundup

Using TECNIS Odyssey™️ IOL in practice: patient selection and outcomes

Juliana

Sumit Garg, MD, spoke with Ophthalmology 360 at the 2024 AAO Annual Meeting about the recent launch of the TECNIS Odyssey IOL and which patients may be the best candidates for this lens.

Sumit Garg, MD:

My name is Sumit Garg. I’m at the University of California, Irvine, Gavin Herbert Eye Institute where I’m a professor of cataract, cornea, and refractive surgery.

The TECNIS Odyssey is the newest IOL from Johnson & Johnson. It’s a full range of vision lens, so it gives you really great distance, intermediate, and near vision, and it has what they’re calling a free-form design. The optic has been modified to allow this great range of vision, also minimizing dysphotopsia and actually enhancing any kind of residual refractive error. There’s some tolerance to residual refractive error. So far in my practice, patients have been really enjoying the lens. I’ve been using the lens for a while now, and it’s really become my fastball when I go to a diffractive optic lens. Previously with other platforms, I had some variability of results, and I’m finding that patients here, especially when it’s implanted bilaterally, they’re getting phenomenal distance vision, intermediate and reading with very low dysphotopsia. A very happy patient and a very happy surgeon.

I start every consult with, “There’s no perfect lens on the market,” and when we talk about diffractive optics in general, our historical lenses have been a little bit of a challenge with respect to predictability of that dysphotopsia. Some patients, they get a lot of it, some patients get very little. With this, patients, by and large, they’re still getting it upfront, but it’s fading very quickly. Their acceptance rate of the dysphotopsia, the minimal dysphotopsia, is really, really high. Several patients say they don’t even see it anymore, which is surprising to me given the diffractive optics. But the proof is in their results. They really are quite happy with the quality of vision. It’s not just my patients. Talking to colleagues and friends who’ve used the lens in several patients, they find the same thing.

When you start with any kind of new lens, you want to start with sort of middle of the road patients. You want to start with patients who have a desire to be out of spectacles, who have otherwise healthy eyes, that they have normal, regular corneal astigmatism, that their retina is healthy, and so typically, I’m looking for those patients that are straightforward. As we go forward off-label indications, post-refractive, putting it just in 1 eye, it’s not off-label, but I find that these lenses usually do well better when you have it in both eyes because you get the binocular summation. But really, good temperament, reasonable, all those things are what you’re looking for in a patient that you’re putting this kind of lens in.

I go through all the options. I’ll start with a monofocal lens. I’ll show them what they’re getting with that lens, and more importantly what they’re not getting with that lens. Then I’ll go through talking about a toric lens, and I have little models that help me really illustrate to the patient. The toric lens, again, talking about the pros and the cons and what you’re getting and not getting and then I’ll move to something like a diffractive lens. With this, I’ll show them the rings. I say, “The reason you get this predictable range of vision is because of these rings, but the vast majority of patients, if you’re a good candidate for the lens, have done really well with it.” Then I ask the typical questions about how important is their range of vision versus their quality of vision. There’s been several patients that say, “Listen, doc, I don’t want any halo and glare.” When I sort of talk to them about the lens a little bit, just to educate them, they realize that, “You know what? Maybe that’ll be okay.” They’ve been very happy with the lens.

I’m actually very, almost shocked, with how minimal the dysphotopsy is. There is still some, so I don’t want to say that there’s none. But the sort of balancing the range of vision with the quality of vision, and then knowing that it’s a TECNIS platform, which is a tried and true platform, there’s some great attributes to that platform that live in this lens as well. All in all, it’s been a really nice offering.

Share

Related Content

  • The Interventional Glaucoma Project

Improving Patient Experience and Practice Workflow With an Interventional Glaucoma Approach

  • The Interventional Glaucoma Project

Data-Driven Focus on Interventional Glaucoma Care

  • Conference Roundup

Cryopreserved amniotic membrane significantly improves ocular surface integrity in patients with severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca and neurotrophic keratopathy

  • Conference Roundup

CAM360 with a collagen shield provides rapid epithelial healing with better tolerability and safety than when used with bandage contact lenses

  • Conference Roundup

Enhanced monofocal IOLs provide better intermediate vision with no rings or dysphotopsia

  • Conference Roundup

Phase 1/2 CLARA study shows AURN001 improves BCVA compared with standard of care for corneal endothelial dysfunction

Share

Editor's Picks

  • Neurotrophic Keratitis

Topical insulin shows real-world benefit in neurotrophic keratopathy

  • Retina

GLP-1 RAs have protective effects against AMD

  • Retina

Four-month injection intervals appear safe for long-term stable nAMD

Advisory Board

Saad Ahmad, MD

Ahmad A. Aref, MD, MBA

Roomasa Channa, MD

David Chow, MD, FRCS(C)

Sally L. Baxter, MD, MSc

Neel R. Desai, MD

Nadia Haqqie, MD

Simon Fung, MD, FRCOphth

Sumit Garg, MD

Ross Lakhanpal, MD, FACS

Sanjai Jalaj, MD

Anton Kolomeyer, MD, PhD

Shan Lin, MD

Steven R. Sarkisian, Jr., MD

See All
Optometry360 Logo

Ophthalmology 360® is a dynamic digital platform dedicated to advancing the field of eye care.

Get to Know Us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media Partners
  • Advertising Policy
  • Our Advisory Board

Sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up for our Newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
IHM Logo

2026 Ophthalmology 360 is a trademark of International Healthcare Media, LLC. All rights reserved

  • MedJournal360 Icon
  • RareDisease360 Icon
  • MyHero360 Icon
  • Optometry360 Icon
  • Ophtalmology360 Icon