Optometry360 Logo White
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board

What are you looking for?

  • Anterior Segment
  • Cataract
  • Cornea and External Disease
  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Dry Eye
  • Early Onset Cataracts
  • Exclusives
  • General
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Glaucoma
  • Industry News
  • Inherited Retinal Disease
  • IOLs
  • Neurotrophic Keratitis
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Oculoplastics
  • Optometry
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice Management
  • Presbyopia
  • Refractive Surgery/Vision Correction
  • Residents & Young Ophthalmologists
  • Retina
  • Retina Care 360
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
  • Spotlight Series
  • The Interventional Glaucoma Project
  • The Ophthalmic Project
  • Trending Topics
Spotlight - The Future of Cryopreserved Amniotic Membrane in Oculoplastic Surgery
Optometry360 Logo White
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board
Home > Cornea and External Disease > Removing sutures enhances accuracy of IOL power calculations in injured eyes
  • Cornea and External Disease

Removing sutures enhances accuracy of IOL power calculations in injured eyes

Kelsey Moroz

In traumatic aphakic eyes with corneal sutures, the most accurate method for calculating intraocular lens (IOL) power is based on the corneal curvature measured after the removal of corneal sutures, according to a study. This approach yields the best refractive outcomes compared to measurements taken from the healthy eye or the affected eye before suture removal.

The study included 261 eyes with unilateral penetrating injuries that underwent corneal wound repair and cataract extraction, followed by secondary IOL implantation. Corneal curvature measurements were obtained from the healthy eye, the affected eye before suture removal, and the affected eye after suture removal. The refractive outcomes among the three groups were then compared.

The study that the mean absolute error (MAE) for IOL power calculations was lowest in the group measured after suture removal (0.99 ± 0.85 D) compared to the group measured from the healthy eye (1.87 ± 1.71 D) and the group measured before suture removal (1.37 ± 1.20 D). In addition, 40% of eyes in the post-suture removal group had IOL prediction errors within ± 0.50 D, higher than 21.7% in the healthy eye group and 28.0% in the pre-suture removal group. For prediction errors within ± 1.0 D, the post-suture removal group had a 90.9% accuracy, significantly better than 67.9% in the healthy eye group and 75.0% in the pre-suture removal group.

Reference
Li C, Chen X, Ke X, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of different corneal curvature measurement methods for IOL implantation in traumatic aphakic eyes with corneal injury. Int Ophthalmol. 2024;44(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03172-z. PMID: 38907133.

Share

Related Content

  • Cornea and External Disease

Quiz: The impact of blepharitis and conjunctivitis on quality of life

  • Cornea and External Disease

Phase 3 trial of cenegermin-bkbj for PCED enrolls first US patient

  • Cornea and External Disease

Cornea specialists identify key clinical signs linked to microbial keratitis subtypes

  • Cataract

IOL exchange shows highest success for dissatisfaction after presbyopia-correcting lens surgery

  • Cataract

Head-to-head study highlights differences between EDoF intraocular lenses

Cornea Update: Corneal Dystrophies & Related Conditions with an Update on Genetic Assessment and Treatment
  • Cornea and External Disease

Preventing complications of superficial keratectomy

Share

Editor's Picks

  • Neurotrophic Keratitis

Topical insulin shows real-world benefit in neurotrophic keratopathy

  • Retina

GLP-1 RAs have protective effects against AMD

  • Retina

Four-month injection intervals appear safe for long-term stable nAMD

Advisory Board

Saad Ahmad, MD

Ahmad A. Aref, MD, MBA

Roomasa Channa, MD

David Chow, MD, FRCS(C)

Sally L. Baxter, MD, MSc

Neel R. Desai, MD

Nadia Haqqie, MD

Simon Fung, MD, FRCOphth

Sumit Garg, MD

Ross Lakhanpal, MD, FACS

Sanjai Jalaj, MD

Anton Kolomeyer, MD, PhD

Shan Lin, MD

Steven R. Sarkisian, Jr., MD

See All
Optometry360 Logo

Ophthalmology 360® is a dynamic digital platform dedicated to advancing the field of eye care.

Get to Know Us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media Partners
  • Advertising Policy
  • Our Advisory Board

Sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up for our Newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
IHM Logo

2026 Ophthalmology 360 is a trademark of International Healthcare Media, LLC. All rights reserved

  • MedJournal360 Icon
  • RareDisease360 Icon
  • MyHero360 Icon
  • Optometry360 Icon
  • Ophtalmology360 Icon