Ophthalmology 360
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Photo Contest
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board

What are you looking for?

  • Anterior Segment
  • Cataract
  • Cornea and External Disease
  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Dry Eye
  • Early Onset Cataracts
  • Exclusives
  • General
  • Geographic Atrophy
  • Glaucoma
  • Industry News
  • Inherited Retinal Disease
  • IOLs
  • Neurotrophic Keratitis
  • Ocular Surface Disease
  • Oculoplastics
  • Optometry
  • Pediatrics
  • Practice Management
  • Presbyopia
  • Refractive Surgery/Vision Correction
  • Residents & Young Ophthalmologists
  • Retina
  • Retina Care 360
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
  • Spotlight Series
  • The Interventional Glaucoma Project
  • The Ophthalmic Project
  • Trending Topics
2nd Annual Photo Contest - Enter Here!
Ophthalmology 360
  • Conferences
  • Videos
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • About
    • About Us – Mission
    • Content Awards
    • Media Partners
    • Business Team
    • Brand Ambassadors
    • Photo Contest
    • Industry Council
    • Advisory Board
Home > Geographic Atrophy > Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for geographic atrophy: ACP vs PEG
  • Geographic Atrophy

Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for geographic atrophy: ACP vs PEG

Ophthalmology 360

While every other month (EOM) treatment with avacincaptad pegol (ACP) is more cost-effective than every month (EM) treatment, pegcetacoplan (PEG) is significantly more cost-effective than ACP for treating extrafoveal lesions, regardless of the treatment frequency, according to a study which underscores the importance of considering both treatment frequency and lesion location in determining the most economical approach to managing geographic atrophy (GA).

The study drew on data from the GATHER2 study as well as the DERBY and OAKS trials, utilizing 2022 Medicare reimbursement rates for both hospital-based (facility) and nonfacility settings in Miami.

The analysis modeled costs over a 2-year period, examining both every month (EM) and every other month (EOM) treatment regimens. The study focused on the cost per unit area of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) saved and cost per day of delaying GA progression.

For ACP, the 2-year costs were $67,400 for EM treatment and $40,600 for EOM treatment. Daily costs for delaying GA by 3.4 months (EM) and 4.5 months (EOM) were calculated at $649 and $356, respectively.

In facility-based settings, the cost per unit area of RPE saved for extrafoveal GA patients over two years was significantly higher for ACP compared to PEG:

  • EM ACP: $119,000/mm² vs. EM PEG: $54,000/mm² (P < 0.001)
  • EOM ACP: $57,100/mm² vs. EOM PEG: $31,400/mm² (P < 0.001)
  • Hypothetical EOM from outset ACP: $45,300/mm²

The study concluded that EOM treatment with ACP was more cost-effective than EM. However, when focusing on extrafoveal lesions, PEG proved to be significantly more cost-effective than ACP for both treatment regimens.

Reference
Patel NA, Hoyek S, Al-Khersan H, et al. A Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Avacincaptad Pegol for the Treatment of Geographic Atrophy with Comparison to Pegcetacoplan. Ophthalmol Retina. 2024;S2468-6530(24)00238-0. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.05.011. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 38777140.

 

This content is independent editorial sponsored by Astellas. Astellas had no input in the development of this content.

Share

Related Content

  • Geographic Atrophy

Geographic atrophy linked to vision loss, higher healthcare costs, and fall risk

  • Geographic Atrophy

Spotlight on IZERVAY®

  • Geographic Atrophy

Two-year GATHER2 data show sustained GA growth reduction with avacincaptad pegol

  • Conference Roundup

Floretina 2025: study shows reduced treatment burden with EYP-1901 for neovascular AMD

3 Mins Watch
  • Geographic Atrophy

Over half of patients with dry AMD developed advanced disease in long-term analysis

  • Geographic Atrophy

Monthly avacincaptad pegol reduces geographic atrophy lesion growth for up to 3.5 years

Share

Editor's Picks

  • Neurotrophic Keratitis

Topical insulin shows real-world benefit in neurotrophic keratopathy

  • Retina

GLP-1 RAs have protective effects against AMD

  • Retina

Four-month injection intervals appear safe for long-term stable nAMD

Advisory Board

Saad Ahmad, MD

Ahmad A. Aref, MD, MBA

Roomasa Channa, MD

David Chow, MD, FRCS(C)

Sally L. Baxter, MD, MSc

Neel R. Desai, MD

Nadia Haqqie, MD

Simon Fung, MD, FRCOphth

Sumit Garg, MD

Ross Lakhanpal, MD, FACS

Sanjai Jalaj, MD

Anton Kolomeyer, MD, PhD

Shan Lin, MD

Steven R. Sarkisian, Jr., MD

See All
Ophthalmology 360

Ophthalmology 360® is a dynamic digital platform dedicated to advancing the field of eye care.

Get to Know Us

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Media Partners
  • Advertising Policy
  • Our Advisory Board

Sign up for our Newsletter

Sign up for our Newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertising Policy
  • Medical Disclaimer
IHM Logo

2026 Ophthalmology 360 is a trademark of International Healthcare Media, LLC. All rights reserved

  • MedJournal360 Icon
  • RareDisease360 Icon
  • MyHero360 Icon
  • Optometry360 Icon
  • Ophtalmology360 Icon